AAR fuel consumption?
Any AAR owners out there who might be able to tell me what their fuel consumption is?
My AAR seems incredibly thirsty. It's been a long time since the previous one I drove (1970!), so maybe I've just forgotten. |
Mine was 16 mpg(imperial) at 60 mph. 357 Cu.in., 284/484 MP cam, 10.3:1 cr, 3.55:1 gearset, 727 cw 10" converter, TTI headers, MP electronic distributor.
|
Originally Posted by Drag Pak
(Post 108493)
Mine was 16 mpg(imperial/4.785 liters) at 60 mph. 357 Cu.in., 284/484 MP cam, 10.3:1 cr, 3.55:1 gearset, 727 cw 10" converter, TTI headers, MP electronic distributor.
|
this is a question that should never be asked. its thirsty because it has 3 carbs yoy dont buy a aar cuda for economy. is it running properly? not out of tune?
|
Originally Posted by AARinOntario
(Post 108536)
Thanks, Drag Pak, but I'm looking for m.p.g. info on a stock AAR, 340-6pack.
Looking for stock #'s may be difficult as not too many owners actually drive them, lol! Or know how to tune them correctly! |
AAR fuel consumption temporary update
Well, I may have found the answer to my problem. The problem is that my AAR appears to be delivering approximately 13 m.p.g. (Imperial) or about 10 miles to the U.S. gallon, and that's mostly highway cruising at 60 m.p.h. or less.
I have observed the engine r.p.m. on the tach at 60 m.p.h. and it seemed excessive at around 3350, so I went on line and the online chart told me that I must have a set of 4:10 rear gears in this car, contrary to the data plate and build sheet which show a 3:55. Next step will be to put the car on a hoist a check the number of driveshaft turns for a full wheel rotation, just to make sure the tach isn't wrong, but it appears that it's the high rear gear that's causing the heavy fuel consumption. |
yea 4:10 is excessive unless your taking it to the strip and occasional cruises
|
Comparing mileage figure today to what you got years ago ? They are different because
gas sold today is 10% garbage ethanol. You will never get 20 mpg with a 6 pack unless you put a 518 trans in it. Then maybe |
TVLynn... Hit the nail right on the head.......
Your not dealing with the same type of fuel.... But don't be to mad at the car... It was considered a performance car in it's day. And I'm sure it does have that!!! :) |
i remember when the AAR and the T / A came out. 1970 i think. if you look at size of cam they have and how fast the car is, you will hard pressed to find a car with that much speed with out being over camed
|
Originally Posted by moe7404
(Post 109749)
i remember when the AAR and the T / A came out. 1970 i think. if you look at size of cam they have and how fast the car is, you will hard pressed to find a car with that much speed with out being over camed
Most of the cars looked, and acted, like a handful for some of the sales people as there were many times that they'd kill the car every time that they let the clutch out! And that deep MOPAR sound emanating from these machines, through mufflers, was like nothing else!! Don't mean to sidetrack the thread but, thanks, for taking me back!! |
The TA & AAR also had special heads !!
|
1 Attachment(s)
And several other special parts.
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:41 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands