Torsion Bars???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-02-2011 | 12:00 PM
  #1  
Monzter Mike's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburg, CA
Torsion Bars???

We're bagging a 62 300 & I wanted to know if I were to remove the torsion bars would that effect the control arm bushings? Looks almost like the torsion bars help keep the arm & bushing together.
Old 11-15-2011 | 11:30 PM
  #2  
Monzter Mike's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburg, CA
Well, no answers on my previous question.

Here's some pics of what we got going on. I will post more pics later.











Old 11-15-2011 | 11:32 PM
  #3  
Monzter Mike's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburg, CA






Old 11-16-2011 | 07:09 PM
  #4  
Coronet 500's Avatar
Mopar Lover
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,732
Likes: 359
From: Ontario Canada
This is a tough one. With the adjuster at the back the only thing the bar would help at the front is to hold the inner and outer steels parallel and reduce wear at the bushing between them. All that said the front strut should hold it reasonably well for what you are doing. My biggest concern would be if you are lowering and raising with air beyond the normal travel a pressed in rubber bushing will likely tear. Usual procedure for ride height adjustment is to tighten the large nut last to have the rubber bushing relaxed and in the middle of normal travel. This is my best guess based on how the Chrysler suspension works.
Old 11-16-2011 | 08:06 PM
  #5  
Silverick's Avatar
Mopar Lover
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 34
From: San Francisco, CA
Don't have the answer but, that '62 is bitchin'!
Old 11-16-2011 | 11:41 PM
  #6  
Monzter Mike's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburg, CA
Originally Posted by Coronet 500
This is a tough one. With the adjuster at the back the only thing the bar would help at the front is to hold the inner and outer steels parallel and reduce wear at the bushing between them. All that said the front strut should hold it reasonably well for what you are doing. My biggest concern would be if you are lowering and raising with air beyond the normal travel a pressed in rubber bushing will likely tear. Usual procedure for ride height adjustment is to tighten the large nut last to have the rubber bushing relaxed and in the middle of normal travel. This is my best guess based on how the Chrysler suspension works.
We tightened the lage nut on shaft coming threw the front side of the engine crossmember where the car would set a little lower than 1/2 way down the suspension cycle. If the rubber bushing doesn't hold up guess we'll have to replace it with some custom. The only other thing I can think of would be to make a double shear mount for the control arm & use a polyurethane end link bushing on the control arm.
Old 11-16-2011 | 11:44 PM
  #7  
Monzter Mike's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburg, CA
Originally Posted by Silverick
Don't have the answer but, that '62 is bitchin'!

Thanks. She's 1/2" off the ground. Lowest of the old skool 300s I've seen.
Old 11-17-2011 | 12:29 AM
  #8  
bremereric's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,609
Likes: 181
From: Houston, Texas
I am 100% sure your car is not a J Body...but cool just the same.
Old 11-17-2011 | 01:58 AM
  #9  
TVLynn's Avatar
Mopar Lover
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,282
Likes: 387
To me ? It needs some kind of strut rod to support the lower control arm movement
Old 11-17-2011 | 11:02 PM
  #10  
Monzter Mike's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburg, CA
Originally Posted by bremereric
I am 100% sure your car is not a J Body...but cool just the same.
LOL! Your right. I did a quick search on line & that's what I came up with. Guess it needs to be in the "Pre 62" forum. If the moderator would move it to the correct forum I might get more response.
Old 11-17-2011 | 11:09 PM
  #11  
Monzter Mike's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburg, CA
Originally Posted by TVLynn
To me ? It needs some kind of strut rod to support the lower control arm movement
The strut rod is still there, you can see it in the last pic I posted.

I've done this set up before, Chevrolet Corvair front end.



Old 11-18-2011 | 07:58 AM
  #12  
Coronet 500's Avatar
Mopar Lover
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,732
Likes: 359
From: Ontario Canada
I like the look of that lower attachment and may be the safer way to go with a heavy car.
Old 11-18-2011 | 03:21 PM
  #13  
Monzter Mike's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburg, CA
Yeah, that's a double shear mount. It's also an eccentric bolt / hole where the alignment is set.
Old 11-18-2011 | 04:28 PM
  #14  
TVLynn's Avatar
Mopar Lover
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,282
Likes: 387
I didn't see the strut rod at first.. If you are concerned about the control arm bushing I would go Poly urethane so it will have free movement
Old 12-01-2011 | 09:35 PM
  #15  
Monzter Mike's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburg, CA
Ended up putting the torsion bars back in today. We put them back in just to assist the bags, it lifted a lot slower in the front than the rear. I tightened them down with a speed handle, that's all the pressure it needed to even out the front & rear lift speed. I forgot to take pics of the rear suspension while the car was up on the lift, I'll post pics of it from the ground.

We've got a 65 1/2 ton Dodge on the lift now. We're lowering it, installing a dropped the I-beam up front & raising the rear spring hangers with front & rear disc brakes. I'll post pics of that one too once we get it done.

Last edited by Monzter Mike; 12-01-2011 at 09:39 PM.
Old 01-04-2013 | 05:06 PM
  #16  
moe7404's Avatar
Mopar Lover
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,846
Likes: 139
if its a REAL 300 1962 i think its a C body. if its a lettered 300 ie "H" it should have a good value. if its 4 door it is NOT a lettered 300. a lettered 1962 H will have a 413 engine with cross ram intake.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
shack440
A-Body
1
07-15-2014 10:15 PM
mosquito13
B-Body
2
06-25-2012 12:09 PM
mikerp76
Chassis, Suspension, and Brakes
12
10-27-2011 01:01 PM
timmie124
B-Body
7
04-10-2011 01:19 PM
thekinzuakid247
General Technical Questions
5
01-03-2008 06:38 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:31 PM.