69 Satellite Exhaust Manifolds
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
i think they are the same. i looked in my parts shed and all the HP manifolds look the same. they all dump out in the same spot. but they all could be 383 or 440? for big blocks i have 383s 400s 440s one 413. but im not sure what manifolds came from wich engines
#12
Mopar Lover
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: East Coast Canada
Posts: 2,509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here are the options for ya.
2806900 exhaust manifold 1967-1969 383 440 HP right
The above is the one you have.
2806974 exhaust manifold 1967 440 HP left
2843953 exhaust manifold 1968-1969 273 318 A-body left
2843992 exhaust manifold 1968-1969 383 440 HP left
Hope this helps.
2806900 exhaust manifold 1967-1969 383 440 HP right
The above is the one you have.
2806974 exhaust manifold 1967 440 HP left
2843953 exhaust manifold 1968-1969 273 318 A-body left
2843992 exhaust manifold 1968-1969 383 440 HP left
Hope this helps.
#13
Hell kitten
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Western Washington
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here are the options for ya.
2806900 exhaust manifold 1967-1969 383 440 HP right
The above is the one you have.
2806974 exhaust manifold 1967 440 HP left
2843953 exhaust manifold 1968-1969 273 318 A-body left
2843992 exhaust manifold 1968-1969 383 440 HP left
Hope this helps.
2806900 exhaust manifold 1967-1969 383 440 HP right
The above is the one you have.
2806974 exhaust manifold 1967 440 HP left
2843953 exhaust manifold 1968-1969 273 318 A-body left
2843992 exhaust manifold 1968-1969 383 440 HP left
Hope this helps.
Polara, do you happen to know the flow rates on the HP manifolds?
Going to have serious trouble installing stock max Wedge exhaust manifolds due to motor location (1.5" further back, so this is a real pain and a lot of cutting) in the 67.
Trying to locate the flow rates for the HP maifolds and also for the MW set....so I can decide whihc to use and if I have to carve up my baby.
TM!
#14
Mopar Lover
#15
Hell kitten
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Western Washington
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, earlier (65 and earlier) B Bodies had the motor 1.5" more forward in the engine compartment than 66 and later cars. By this, I mean, as you face the engine compartment, the engine would be 1.5" closer to you, away from the firewall. Not a problem, I thought, at first, except maybe fan/radiator clearance. I have not verified the placement of the motor in a pre and post 65 myself, but if Schumaker and TTI (whom I spoke with about my exhaust and not the headers) and Accurate Exhaust Products all tell me the same thing, I am pretty sure it's right. After all, this is their living (the last two reproduce MW exhaust systems, among other things).
Well, not even Schumaker in Seattle makes an adapter to do that 1.5" move forward. I asked. I would have to fabricate an add-on plate. Again, non-issue, right? Then, of course, the trans mount would have to be relocated. Getting worse...and then, a new drive line would have to be made. Add this on top of the already semi-custom max wedge exhaust I wanted to run and this portion alone will run me around 2K.
The other alternative? Equally as ugly.
The passenger Max Wedge exhaust manifold makes a tight ram curl, and at the factory 1967 motor location, this will directly impact on....my firewall. Right where it meets my floor pan, right at the passenger's feet. So I would have to cut both my firewall and floorpan and fabricate something to accomodate that manifold, something about 6" and 6". Ouch. And ugly. Right on the floor.
So basically, I have four evils. 1) rearrange everything in the drivetrain 2) cut my car up 3) use other manifolds or 4) use headers. I hate headers for the record.
I spoke with David Hakim (formerly of MP and now of Mancini Racing) and he says to suck it up and buy the TTI headers. Save some , save the headache and hassle, increase my HP and my exhaust will be cheaper to have done locally in a Max Wedge-style with the exhaust dumps.
Sigh.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Polara_68
General Technical Questions
3
09-01-2009 06:10 PM