1973 Road runner VS 2010 Camaro

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-01-2009 | 07:33 PM
  #2  
crmzendrgone's Avatar
Mopar Fanatic
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: ARIZONA
Sounds like you already know the outcome. I would say Roadrunner.
Old 09-01-2009 | 07:43 PM
  #3  
Oldsmobileman's Avatar
Mopar Fanatic
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton, FL
There is no such thing as a fair fight or fair race, And when a metal car trades paint with a fiber-plastic car....well, there can only be 1 highlander.
Old 09-01-2009 | 07:50 PM
  #4  
crmzendrgone's Avatar
Mopar Fanatic
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: ARIZONA
Originally Posted by Oldsmobileman
There is no such thing as a fair fight or fair race, And when a metal car trades paint with a fiber-plastic car....well, there can only be 1 highlander.
I like that. What ever happened to 1/4 mile times i hear a lot about 1/8th mile time what is the differnce besides the obvious?
Old 09-01-2009 | 08:24 PM
  #6  
67 GTX's Avatar
Mopar Lover
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,204
Likes: 4
From: Brooklyn, N.Y.
i think the camaro will win both the 1/8 mile and the 1/4 mile
sorry
it is geared better, and it has more power
Old 09-02-2009 | 08:28 AM
  #9  
67 GTX's Avatar
Mopar Lover
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,204
Likes: 4
From: Brooklyn, N.Y.
what parts are you adding?
Old 09-02-2009 | 09:55 AM
  #10  
Oldsmobileman's Avatar
Mopar Fanatic
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton, FL
Originally Posted by 67 GTX
what parts are you adding?
I think the best performance part would be a 440...just my opinion.
Old 09-02-2009 | 10:57 AM
  #11  
78D200's Avatar
Admin
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 8,173
Likes: 200
From: Goffstown, NH
HP in this case means nothing. What you want to look at is torque. The more torque you can get to the wheels and get that to hookup, the better off you are. Those numbers for the camaro are probably at the crank too.
Old 09-02-2009 | 12:29 PM
  #12  
67 GTX's Avatar
Mopar Lover
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,204
Likes: 4
From: Brooklyn, N.Y.
Originally Posted by 78D200
Those numbers for the camaro are probably at the crank too.
i doubt it
fuel injection and computers give these engines a lot more horsepower
Old 09-02-2009 | 01:59 PM
  #14  
johnthegoalie's Avatar
thinkin with me dipstick
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 930
Likes: 2
From: sw desert
ok now, what if the plymouth was driven by a ditka with no hands and the camaro was driven by a ditka with an eyepatch? who would win?
Old 09-02-2009 | 02:01 PM
  #15  
johnthegoalie's Avatar
thinkin with me dipstick
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 930
Likes: 2
From: sw desert
better question is who with a 2010 camaro did you tell you would beat
Old 09-02-2009 | 02:44 PM
  #16  
67 GTX's Avatar
Mopar Lover
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,204
Likes: 4
From: Brooklyn, N.Y.
Originally Posted by roadrunner73
im adding a perfomance intake, 1" carb spacer, mabey bor out my carb and posibly if i have money left over a better cam
that wont add 170 hp
what is your rear end ratio?
Old 09-02-2009 | 05:31 PM
  #17  
Oldsmobileman's Avatar
Mopar Fanatic
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton, FL
You know who would win? Da' Bears!
Old 09-02-2009 | 06:44 PM
  #20  
67 GTX's Avatar
Mopar Lover
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,204
Likes: 4
From: Brooklyn, N.Y.
you probably have a 3.23 rear end
Old 09-02-2009 | 07:16 PM
  #22  
crmzendrgone's Avatar
Mopar Fanatic
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: ARIZONA
Well originally in fear of saying a CAMARO would win because it is a GM car. I will now confidently say CAMARO, besides i had a 87 IROC Z28 three weeks into owning it put it through a brick wall.
Old 09-02-2009 | 08:08 PM
  #24  
72RDRNR's Avatar
Mopar Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Originally Posted by 67 GTX
that wont add 170 hp
what is your rear end ratio?
I will have to agree with 67GTX here. To get that number you will be looking at a bit of laughing gas and even then the camaro might be laughing at you. Sorry but you know what they say - displacement displacement displacement. There is no substitution for cubic inches. Plus you are giving up almost 300 hp!!!
Old 09-03-2009 | 01:00 AM
  #26  
johnthegoalie's Avatar
thinkin with me dipstick
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 930
Likes: 2
From: sw desert
dont bet anything you cant live without...
Old 09-03-2009 | 07:19 AM
  #27  
crmzendrgone's Avatar
Mopar Fanatic
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: ARIZONA
At least be a good sport about it when the race is over. I have lost my fair share of races that I believed i should have won.
Old 09-03-2009 | 07:33 AM
  #28  
BuckNeccid's Avatar
Mopar Lover
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 514
Likes: 7
From: South Point OH
if you're bracket racing, you should take him, but in a heads up, run what you brung, I think you're gonna get beat. The 6 spd is going to make him inconsistent if it's anything like my Challenger, and he's going to fluctuate about .4 sec per pass. Make sure you get some good time trials, and don't line up beside him at all till the real races start and you get your handicap.
Old 09-03-2009 | 08:24 AM
  #29  
67 GTX's Avatar
Mopar Lover
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,204
Likes: 4
From: Brooklyn, N.Y.
Originally Posted by BuckNeccid
The 6 spd is going to make him inconsistent if it's anything like my Challenger, and he's going to fluctuate about .4 sec per pass.
how come?
its an auto.


Quick Reply: 1973 Road runner VS 2010 Camaro



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:29 AM.