more power from a 318

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 14, 2011 | 06:24 PM
  #1  
tscw's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
more power from a 318

what are some cheap/easy ways to add power to a 318 found in a '79 volare and how much more power can you expect? Thanks for any help
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2011 | 07:35 PM
  #2  
Coronet 500's Avatar
Mopar Lover
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,732
Likes: 361
From: Ontario Canada
If your not taking it apart a small 4 barrel and this cam should get you 300HP and 350TQ. http://www.compcams.com/Company/CC/c...?csid=625&sb=2

Check retainer to guide and a spring change would be wise. The first suggestion most will say is pistons and compression but this worked well in one of mine. Remember most had .390"-.410" lift max.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2011 | 07:40 PM
  #3  
Archer's Avatar
Mopar Lover
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,889
Likes: 170
From: Long Island, NY
tscw -

Same as any other engine. Cam, exhaust (headers and duals with good mufflers) new intake manifold and carb (based on cam size). Then you can upgrade your ignition system etc...

You'll need to check what gears you have in the rear before figuring on your RPM range and you might need some tranny work to keep things together.

How much horsepower will be based on the parts chosen and how drivable you want to keep it. AN increase of 50 - 75 HP won't do too much damage, but you cna certainly go higher.

Without know what the motor is going into or what you plan on doing with the car makes specifics a little difficult.

Archer
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2011 | 08:40 PM
  #4  
440roadrunner's Avatar
Mopar Lover
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,424
Likes: 248
"Upgrading the ignition" is one of the FIRST things I'd do, IE get a distributor with a more performance oriented advance curve. Obviously, if this is a lean burn system, get rig of it.

However, if you are "somewhere" that requires smog certification, you'd better do some local research. "Legally" you can't do anything to the engine, emissions wise.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2011 | 09:15 PM
  #5  
bremereric's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,609
Likes: 181
From: Houston, Texas
From an article at Mopar Muscle

One man's trash is another's treasure, and when it comes to bottom feeding in the world of Mopar engines the 318 seems like the biggest bargain in town. Know for efficient grocery getting in modest transportation, the musclecar aura never kissed the 318. Though the 318's long production run began in 1968, poised perfectly to participate in the height of the musclecar era, it was only available as a two-barrel economy until the deep dark days of the smog era in 1978. Without the cool reputation as a powerhouse like the bigger 340, 318s are routinely plucked from all manner of Chrysler products, and are practically handed out for haulage in Mopar circles. Be that as it may, there are some true 318 devotees in the Mopar world, impressed by the efficiency and long service this loyal mill provides.

So what's wrong with the 318? Obviously, it's a little light on displacement, but not compared to some more highly revered engines of the past-302 Chevys or Boss Fords, for instance. The most commonly heard objection is that the bore is small, creating shrouding that hurts flow and makes big power impossible, since at 3.91-inches it's not quite at the "magic" 4.000-inch mark. Yeah right-tell it to the LS1 crowd. Those engines are known for their breathing despite an even smaller bore. With Mopar's factory 18 degree valve angle, this is pretty much a moot point for most street builds. The fact is a 318 can be the basis for a nice small-displacement, high-rpm powerplant. With its short 3.31-inch stroke, high rpm are natural. A case can be made for a small-displacement street engine that's fuel efficient by virtue of its modest size, but piles on the power on demand when needed, by winding the revs up the scale. With the 318 Mopar as a base, such an engine can be built for a ridiculously low price. Better still, you will always be the underdog, and there is nothing like talking smack when putting the hurt on the big boys with a "lowly" 318.

Our goal was to build a hot street engine, using the attributes of the factory package to its best advantage, keeping the build as cheap as practical. All 318s use long 6.123-inch rods, though the 1973 and later engines had the stronger but heavier 340/360 forgings, which are better. These later rods are stout from the factory, and toy with engine speeds on the order of 6,500 rpm, and even a little more. Nearly all 318s came with cast cranks, and here again the factory stuff can take 6,500 rpm handily. In fact there is nothing in the stock engine that can't work exceptionally well in that rpm range, including the lubrication system, electronic ignition, and even the production valvetrain. I guess you can fairly say that these engines are all 6,500-plus-rpm screamers just waiting to be unleashed; here's how we did it.

The Build
Low compression is a drawback of any 318, with all of the factory pistons dwelling deep in the hole at TDC. The low-cost remedy here is a set of KB 167 flat-top pistons, which allow for a zero deck with minimal milling. We had the guys at Precision Speed and Machine, in Bakersfield, California, punch our virgin 318 block 0.040-inch over, to 3.950-inch (getting close to 4.000-inch there, aren't we?), and then zero deck the block. With this overbore, the 318 grows to 324 cid. This minimal level of machining prep will usually be all that is required to build a hot street 318. We used a 273 steel crank in our engine, only because we found it in the dirt at the local boneyard, but any of the factory cast cranks are more than up to the job. To complete the short-block, we had the rods reconditioned with new Pioneer bolts, and used a factory windage tray, as well as a homemade sheetmetal baffle in the pan to prevent oil slosh. A summery of bottom-end mods is a pretty short list, basically all we did was put the flat top pistons in, milled for zero deck, balanced it, and put it back together with all re-conned factory stock stuff. Moving on to the top-end, here is where you might expect to find the secrets to making the big power put down by this little engine. Well, normally a really trick set of heads can work wonders, but here we just used a boneyard set of plain old 360 Mopar smog heads. After all, few guys will cap a $500 short with a $1,500 set of heads. All of those '70s-80s 360 heads essentially carry the same port layout of the high performance 340, and as far as run-of-the-mill production iron of the era, they are about as good as it gets. In fact, these old-school heads have a big advantage over the later castings. The pushrod constriction is much less intrusive than that found on engines spawned in the hydraulic roller era, far less than even the Magnum heads of the '90s. The bottom line is that these 360 heads have plenty of intake port for a very stout 318.

All of the 360 Mopar heads came from the factory with 1.88-inch intake valves, 1.600-inch valves at the exhaust, and big open chambers, at 72cc. To step things up, we started by having the heads machined for 2.02-inch intake valves. Some weird urban legend has it that 2.02-inch intake valves will not fit a 318, or that bore notches are required. Actually, even a standard-bore 318 will swallow valves of this size, so no problemo for our 0.040-over mill. After the seat machining, the heads received a little porting, consisting of a basic bowl blend, and some work at the pushrod area. Far from an all-out effort, these heads got little more than a swizzle of the carbide cutter-not even the ugly guide bosses were cut. These modifications may not seem like much, but it was enough to tap well into the potential of the castings, and produce respectable flow (See: Flow Chart). To reduce the chamber volume for our small displacement engine, the heads were milled fairly heavily to 60cc.

Even though most guys think 318s don't have what it takes to make power, we started with a production 318 block, and decided to build it on the cheap. Precision Speed and Machine (PSM) punched it 0.040 for a set of KB 167 flat-tops, and zero decked it. We gave it the customary clean before assembly.

Federal Mogul bearings were used throughout the build. We used Childs & Albert assembly lube to coat the plain bearing at the rods and crank.

Though most 318s came with cast cranks, we happened to run across a factory-forged crank from a 273. Don't feel bad if all you have is a cast iron piece, they are generally reliable at 6,500 rpm. We balanced the crank at PSM, and recommend you do, too. The odd-looking bolts at the No. 2 and 4 main caps are to take the factory windage tray. We used the stock main fasteners.

Even though we went with the cheaper Federal Mogul moly pre-gapped rebuilder's rings instead of the better file-fit SpeedPros, we checked the gaps to get them in specs for the KB pistons, which run wider gaps.

The KB 167 pistons have deep valve notches that will swallow all kinds of lift, even with milled heads. The pistons have to go in order corresponding to the valve layout.

The rods are regular Mopar factory units, actually the 73-up 318 forgings, which are the same as the 360 rods, which were the same as the 340 high-performance rods, except without the pin bushings. These rods are long at 6.123", and you won't break them with your street 318 (or 360). The rods were reconditioned, fitted with new Pioneer bolts, and the pistons hung, at PSM. We just put them in their holes and torqued-up.
Attached Thumbnails more power from a 318-0667_phrs_01_z-mopar_318_engine-.jpg   more power from a 318-0667_phrs_02_z-mopar_318_engine-.jpg   more power from a 318-0667_phrs_03_z-mopar_318_engine-.jpg   more power from a 318-0667_phrs_04_z-mopar_318_engine-.jpg   more power from a 318-0667_phrs_05_z-mopar_318_engine-.jpg  


Last edited by bremereric; Dec 14, 2011 at 09:22 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2011 | 09:16 PM
  #6  
bremereric's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,609
Likes: 181
From: Houston, Texas
Part 2

Tallying up so far we had a stock short with flat-tops, and a set of milled junkyard heads with bigger intake valves and very modest porting. It may not sound like much, but this is good stuff for a 318 build. The next consideration was the camshaft. Here we gravitated towards a hydraulic flat tappet, which may not be romantic, but is certainly budget conscious. A solid flat tappet certainly would have offered even more rpm potential, but a hydraulic allows us to use the factory valvetrain. While the OEM valvetrain is non-adjustable, and looks as low-tech as it gets, it is extraordinarily lightweight, and being a shaft system, it's as stable as it comes. With a hydraulic cam, the ugly stock stuff will out-rpm virtually anything from the aftermarket.So what's wrong with the 318? Obviously, it's a little light on displacement, but not compared to some more highly revered engines of the past-302 Chevys or Boss Fords, for instance. The most commonly heard objection is that the bore is small, creating shrouding that hurts flow and makes big power impossible, since at 3.91-inches it's not quite at the "magic" 4.000-inch mark. Yeah right-tell it to the LS1 crowd. Those engines are known for their breathing despite an even smaller bore. With Mopar's factory 18 degree valve angle, this is pretty much a moot point for most street builds. The fact is a 318 can be the basis for a nice small-displacement, high-rpm powerplant. With its short 3.31-inch stroke, high rpm are natural. A case can be made for a small-displacement street engine that's fuel efficient by virtue of its modest size, but piles on the power on demand when needed, by winding the revs up the scale. With the 318 Mopar as a base, such an engine can be built for a ridiculously low price. Better still, you will always be the underdog, and there is nothing like talking smack when putting the hurt on the big boys with a "lowly" 318.


Our goal was to build a hot street engine, using the attributes of the factory package to its best advantage, keeping the build as cheap as practical. All 318s use long 6.123-inch rods, though the 1973 and later engines had the stronger but heavier 340/360 forgings, which are better. These later rods are stout from the factory, and toy with engine speeds on the order of 6,500 rpm, and even a little more. Nearly all 318s came with cast cranks, and here again the factory stuff can take 6,500 rpm handily. In fact there is nothing in the stock engine that can't work exceptionally well in that rpm range, including the lubrication system, electronic ignition, and even the production valvetrain. I guess you can fairly say that these engines are all 6,500-plus-rpm screamers just waiting to be unleashed; here's how we did it.


Mopars have another advantage, and that is the 0.904-inch tappet diameter, which translates to about 8 percent more intensity at the valve with a cam designed to make use of the large lifter diameter. COMP has just the cams for the job, with their Mopar-only XEHL series. This is a variation of the popular Xtreme Energy cam series, but built to provide the additional intensity the 0.904-inch lifters allow. We went with the smallest of this series, the XE275HL, specing out at 231/237-degrees duration at 0.050, and 0.525-inch lift, on a 110 degree lobe separation angle. This duration level is enough to give a noticeable chop at idle, but not temperamental enough to make you insane in day-to-day driving. To cope with the aggressive rate of this cam, we used a fairly significant level of spring load for a flat tappet, deciding on a set of COMP 972 single springs installed at 1.750-inch, for 140 lbs on the seat and 310 lbs over the nose.


The final aspect of the build to consider is the induction, and here past experience has taught us that there is no beating an Edelbrock Performer RPM AirGap in the street range up to 6,500 rpm. That much was a given, but motivated by ultimate cheapness we bolted-on a TransDapt adapter plate, which allowed us to mount a factory Mopar ThermoQuad carb. The TQ carb is actually a fine unit, and the one we used is the larger version rated at 850 cfm of airflow, though an 800-cfm unit was also OEM equipment. That may seem like a huge amount of carb for a 318, but an odd characteristic of the TQ is that it allows monstrous capacity to work on seemingly impossibly small combinations. Finally a set of TTI headers with 1 5/8- to 1 3/4-inch primaries were obtained to handle the exhaust, and we had our combo. On paper, it seemed pretty tame, a flat-top piston 318, with mildly reworked iron 360 smog heads, a hydraulic flat tappet, an Edelbrock two plane, a stock four barrel, and headers. We knew better.


Running The Numbers
When we brought our 318 to Westech Performance Group for testing, the attractively detailed 318 Mopar drew some interest, and naturally a few questions about the combination. We revealed it was a 318, basically a factory short-block put together with KB flat-tops and a hydraulic flat tappet, mildly ported ordinary factory 360 heads, and the four-barrel setup with the ThermoQuad visible to all. By the specs, it didn't seem like much, especially being "only a 318", so there was some serious doubt when we confidently stated that it should make over 400 hp. After all, mildly reworked 318s don't make that kind of power, especially with some junkyard heads. Well, it didn't take long to silence the skeptics, when the engine was broken in and then loaded against the brake for the first power pulls. With out baseline combination, the engine zinged-up the rpm scale to make 400 hp at 6,200-6,300 rpm.


We could see that the 318 was doing exactly what we expected-making lots of power and rpm. We could also see from the dyno sheets that the factory ThermoQuad carburetor was running at least a point too rich, and it was time to make a decision. There were a few things we wanted to try while on the dyno, and we only had one day reserved for testing, and about half of that was already eaten just setting the Mopar mill up on the dyno, and getting our baseline figures. Experience has taught us that playing with the ThermoQuad could easily soak the rest of the day in tuning, so we decided to substitute a Mighty Demon 750-cfm carb, primarily for its easy tuning changes. A 1-inch open spacer was used to mimic the 1-inch adapter that had been necessary with the ThermoQuad. With some quick jet changes of the Demon to get our mixture in the bullseye, we had 406 hp showing at the same 6,200-6,300 rpm peak.



We used a set of mildly worked factory 360 Smog heads. 2.02" intake valves were fitted, plus a nice performance valve job was done, along with some minor bowl blending. The heads were milled pretty heavily to reduce the chamber volume to 60cc. We built them with COMP's No. 972 spring installed at 1.750", giving 140 lbs on the seat and 310 over the nose.

A set of FelPro gaskets sealed the heads, which were installed using the stock 318 head bolts. The head/piston combination gave us a compression ratio of just over 10:1.

COMP's XE275HL is a hydraulic flat tappet designed for maximum intensity with a Mopar's 0.904" tappet diameter. Measuring 275/287 gross duration, 231-237 @ 0.050" tappet rise, and 0.525/0.525" lift with 1.5:1 rockers, this cam has very high lift for its duration, which means the best trade in all out power for a given idle quality.
Attached Thumbnails more power from a 318-0667_phrs_06_z-mopar_318_engine-.jpg   more power from a 318-0667_phrs_07_z-mopar_318_engine-.jpg   more power from a 318-0667_phrs_08_z-mopar_318_engine-.jpg   more power from a 318-0667_phrs_09_z-mopar_318_engine-.jpg   more power from a 318-0667_phrs_10_z-mopar_318_engine-.jpg  


Last edited by bremereric; Dec 14, 2011 at 09:24 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2011 | 09:20 PM
  #7  
bremereric's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,609
Likes: 181
From: Houston, Texas
Part 3

Small-block Mopars use a thrust plate at the front of the cam, which restrains fore and aft motion. The tab under the right lower bolt was used in later engines for timing chain oiling, while earlier engines had four bolts retaining the thrust plate, with the upper right being hollow to allow oil to drain through it from the lifter valley.

Up front we re-used the stock timing case cover and damper, but purchased a generic new water pump for good measure. On these engines, install the damper before tightening the cover bolts, so that the damper's nose will center the front seal when the cover's fasteners are tightened down.

Underneath, everything is stock stuff, including the oil pump, pick-up, and windage tray. The tray was found on many heavy-duty, four barrel, or police 318s.

Inside, the engine still had its fill of 20-50 conventional diesel oil used for break-in. We figured the little Mopar mill had gotten over the critical flat tappet cam break-in period by now. There was the potential for a little more power with the oil change, so we switched to Lucas 5-20 full synthetic oil for our next series of runs. The synthetic offers a lower viscosity, and presumably lower friction, which we hoped would result in some additional power by a reduction of parasitic drag. The oil change proved to be a positive step, with output now reaching 412 hp at the exact same power peak.


Dyno operator Steve Brule suggested we might gain some additional power by swapping the 1-inch open spacer for a tapered combination spacer. We grabbed a 4150-sized HVH SuperSucker spacer from our shelf, and made the change. The SuperSucker provides a tapered entry from the carb into the plenum; with some combinations this can add incrementally to the output. It proved to be the case with our 318 Mopar combination, taking peak output to 415 hp at 6,300 rpm, which would prove to be the best numbers of the day.


Our 318 cam delivered a rated 0.525-inch lift with 1.5:1-ratio rockers. Under the valve covers we were running the stock Mopar hydraulic rocker valvetrain, which we just cleaned and re-used, including the stock solid bar 5/16-inch pushrods. Although this non-adjustable valvetrain looks crude, test after test has proven it to be remarkably capable in hydraulic cam applications where adustablility is not strictly required. These stamped-steel rockers are lighter than anything from the aftermarket, and the ingenious shaft-mount system lets the rockers ride with virtually no clearance on broad bearing surface at the lower half of the rocker, sliding on a film of oil much like a main bearing. Friction at the shaft is virtually nil, and the stability is excellent. Still, we wanted to see if a little more lift could be added with a higher rocker ratio, so we swapped to a set of aluminum 1.6:1 roller rockers. This would get us to 0.560-inch lift.


The rocker change didn't work out, and in fact, the engine's effective rpm range dropped dramatically, down to 6,100 rpm, as compared to the easy and clean 6,700 rpm ceiling (the limit of our test range, not the engine's rpm capabilities) with the factory stock 1.5:1 rockers. We tried setting the lash to zero, to curb lifter pump-up, but it didn't help. What went wrong? In my experience, there are definite limits to how much intensity can be used with a hydraulic lifter, be it a flat tappet or roller. We were over that line with our overall combination.


With the super-quick 0.904-inch cam lobe profile, even with the 1.5:1 rockers we were already reaching a very high lift when considering the overall duration. As previously noted, these "0.904-profile" lobes are about 8 percent faster than high intensity 0.842-profile lobes, and the high-ratio rockers add another 7 percent. At the resultant 0.560-inch lift on a 231 @ 0.050 lobe, with only 275 rated seat duration, the valve action is well into the range of a very aggressive solid roller, far faster, in fact, through the early stages of the valve event. The result is valvetrain instability, which the hydraulic mechanism of the lifter cannot cope with. We've been through it before, and increased spring load will do little to help the situation. Besides, with longevity in mind, our COMP No. 972 springs were at the limit of loads we'd run in a street flat tappet application. If hunting for the far reaches of hydraulic cam intensity and rpm, the direction has to be mass reduction throughout the valvetrain, including lightweight valves. The 3/8-stem street valves and now heavier rockers just weren't gong to cut it with this combination.


Should we be disappointed that the higher ratio rockers didn't work? Maybe not, since it told us that the factory stuff, when combined with the fast COMP lobe profiles, is in the upper range of the potential available. While more would definitely be possible with trick lightweight components like valves, these items are somewhat out of the budget nature of this build. It also reinforces the value of the stock Mopar valvetrain. It represents a significant cost savings compared to other makes of engines where a valvetrain swap is virtually mandatory for survival with a high performance cam. Thinking about the results, we were pretty happy with the 415 streetable hp and 6,500-plus rpm capabilities we got from Chrysler's neglected 318, especially considering how much of this engine consists of nothing more than mundane factory production parts.


It won't make you a lick of power on the dyno, but the best thing you can do to your small-block Mopar's lubrication system for the street is to add a pan baffle. We made this one, and welded it to the stock pan. If you don't want to fab, buy a baffled pan, or you will rash the bearings on slicks.

Meet Mr. Ugly; this ThermoQuad flows 850 cfm, and with enough patience and tuning will run with anything on a combo like this. Pluses include metering that is extremely sophisticated, a plastic body that keep fuel much cooler inside, and you can get them at an average of twenty bucks a throw. Minuses include laborious tuning. We used an 850-cfm TQ, on top of the excellent Edelbrock Performer RPM AirGap.


For hassle-free dyno duty, we stabbed an MSD distributor, which works with the Dyno's MSD box, along with MSD wires and Denso plugs to complete the ignition. A blue and a silver spring and the thick black bushing dialed in the timing curve for max power.


For exhaust, we went with TTI's excellent small-block Mopar step headers, and went the full exhaust route with a pair of Hooker Max-Flow mufflers. The mufflers didn't cost any horsepower.

Right off the bat our mongrel 318 clicked off 400 hp at 6,200-6,300 rpm, despite the TQ running too rich. Not bad, huh?

There is no debate that a Demon carb is easier and quicker to tune than the TQ, and time was ticking. We made a quick swap to a 750 Mighty Demon atop a Wilson spacer, and within a couple of jet changes had 406 hp at 6,200- 6,300 rpm.

An oil change to Lucas 5-20 synthetic, and a swap to a HVH tapered combo spacer helped power even more, allowing this "lowly" 318 to tag 415 hp. That's not a bad number for a simple and dirt cheap street combination, and more than we've seen some bigger street builds make.

Hollywood Steve "Stevie" Brule added a set of 1.6:1 aluminum rockers, and even set at zero lash, the rpm capability crashed. We had as much spring as we were willing to run on the street, so this is a dead player with the high-velocity cam, at least without serious attention to lightening the valvetrain. Some 8mm or hollow-stem valves, Ti. retainers, and beehive springs may have allowed the hydraulic lifters to cope.
Attached Thumbnails more power from a 318-0667_phrs_11_z-mopar_318_engine-.jpg   more power from a 318-0667_phrs_12_z-mopar_318_engine-.jpg   more power from a 318-0667_phrs_13_z-mopar_318_engine-.jpg   more power from a 318-0667_phrs_14_z-mopar_318_engine-.jpg   more power from a 318-0667_phrs_15_z-mopar_318_engine-.jpg  


Last edited by bremereric; Dec 14, 2011 at 09:30 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2011 | 09:27 PM
  #8  
bremereric's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,609
Likes: 181
From: Houston, Texas
Just the rest of the pictures.
Attached Thumbnails more power from a 318-0667_phrs_16_z-mopar_318_engine-.jpg   more power from a 318-0667_phrs_17_z-mopar_318_engine-.jpg   more power from a 318-0667_phrs_18_z-mopar_318_engine-.jpg   more power from a 318-0667_phrs_19_z-mopar_318_engine-.jpg   more power from a 318-0667_phrs_20_z-mopar_318_engine-.jpg  

Reply
Old Dec 14, 2011 | 09:29 PM
  #9  
bremereric's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,609
Likes: 181
From: Houston, Texas
Two more.

Two more.
Attached Thumbnails more power from a 318-0667_phrs_21_z-mopar_318_engine-.jpg   more power from a 318-0667_phrs_22_z-mopar_318_engine-.jpg  
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2011 | 02:41 PM
  #10  
tscw's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Thanks for the feedback. Correct me if Im wrong, but a stock 318 only makes around 140hp, right?
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2011 | 04:44 PM
  #11  
Coronet 500's Avatar
Mopar Lover
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,732
Likes: 361
From: Ontario Canada
Before 1972 Gross HP was 230, then it became SAE advertised HP at 145-150. If you look it up you"ll get a more completre answer than I can give here.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2011 | 07:28 PM
  #12  
bremereric's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,609
Likes: 181
From: Houston, Texas
My 1968 Dart with 318 was 230 hp, my 1977 Aspen with a 318 was 145 hp.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2011 | 03:02 AM
  #13  
tscw's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
So if I switch the 2brl with a 4brl, get new cams, and add headers, how manyhorse power could i gain? And how much do headers cost that would fit on a '79 Volare?
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2011 | 09:23 AM
  #14  
bremereric's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,609
Likes: 181
From: Houston, Texas
Originally Posted by tscw
So if I switch the 2brl with a 4brl, get new cams, and add headers, how manyhorse power could i gain? And how much do headers cost that would fit on a '79 Volare?
Headman makes a set that fit. Your killer on your motor is you Compression Ratio. The pistons are a half inch below deck at TDC. Your heads suck pretty bad to. I was just there about 4 months ago. So throwing on a 4 barrel carb and a set of headers along with a cam won't get you much.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2011 | 02:57 PM
  #15  
Coronet 500's Avatar
Mopar Lover
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,732
Likes: 361
From: Ontario Canada
We did a truck like your talking about with the cam I listed previously and it has a ton of low end grunt and idles like a kitten. It's an '88 and the pistons were down about .060" the '70 was down about .090".
If you want to know outputs, download Comp Cams Camquest 6 program and fool around with combinations. It will give you HP and TQ readouts in graph form.
Remember that if you go with bigger valve and port heads the 318's will make alot of HP up high but little torque. If you stay with smaller heads you will get more velocity with loads more torque and a sacrifice in upper HP. These little engines are very versatile and easily tuned.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2011 | 03:42 PM
  #16  
78D200's Avatar
Admin
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 8,173
Likes: 200
From: Goffstown, NH
Eric - I copied your posts to the TTOTM for smll blocks. It seems like a good read.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2011 | 04:38 PM
  #17  
bremereric's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,609
Likes: 181
From: Houston, Texas
Originally Posted by 78D200
Eric - I copied your posts to the TTOTM for smll blocks. It seems like a good read.
That it was Tim. You want some bigger pictures?
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2016 | 07:23 PM
  #19  
aceofspades's Avatar
Mopar Fan
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 25
Likes: 1
From: Music City
Good info

I just bought a 1978 D150 Prospector and have been looking for ways to beef up the 318.

Looks like a no go with all that would need to be done. I'll just be happy with the 145 hp stock 318 2 barrel and duals lol.

In the fine condition it's in with only 51,XXX original miles I can get by for a while.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2016 | 06:47 PM
  #20  
Coronet 500's Avatar
Mopar Lover
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,732
Likes: 361
From: Ontario Canada
One of the first and cheapest things to get some snap in the engine is recurving the distributor. Adding some initial with limiting secondary mechanical advance to a total of 34, all in by 2500rpm will help and be felt.

If you go for a 4 barrel the cast iron 360 manifold is very good and can be found for few dollars. For a carb I would definitely go with a spread bore.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kgraham
New Members
16
Sep 27, 2013 08:25 AM
cyah
B-Body
3
Jan 28, 2011 07:13 AM
DBlackford
94-Current Dodge Trucks
3
Dec 17, 2010 05:11 PM
heminez
General Technical Questions
1
Aug 26, 2009 05:29 PM
mopar nate
General Discussion
7
Apr 29, 2009 06:54 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:51 AM.