318 LA Engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 3, 2014 | 03:33 PM
  #1  
Leem's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mopar Fanatic
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 447
Likes: 40
From: Quesnel, BC, Canada
318 LA Engine

Hi,
Was there any difference in the 318 engine used in say a Challenger as opposed to one used in a pickup?


Marty
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2014 | 05:28 PM
  #2  
moe7404's Avatar
Mopar Lover
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,846
Likes: 140
chrysler did have a 318 version in heavy duty trucks. the exact years i dont know. i dont know all the differences. one is the heads. it listed as a 318 - III. the heads had diff ext manifold. and iam sure the compression ratio was lower. the distributor curve might be diff. thats all i know for sure. may be water pump or the in side of the pump. my idea is they was trying to control heat. ill bet racer hog knows more than i do.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2014 | 07:10 PM
  #3  
Coronet 500's Avatar
Mopar Lover
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,732
Likes: 361
From: Ontario Canada
They are basically the same, block, crank, rods, pistons and heads, some will have slightly different cams.

The major differences would be with oil pan exhaust manifolds to fit in the different type vehicles.

Like any model it will have it's own tune, carb and ignition timing. No hidden years with forged pistons or anything like that.

It you were to take either and hot rod with cam, manifold, carb, ignition and headers you'd end up with about exactly the same engine.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2014 | 10:30 PM
  #4  
Leem's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mopar Fanatic
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 447
Likes: 40
From: Quesnel, BC, Canada
Thanks for the info. I'm planning on putting a 318 in my newly acquired 55 Powerwagon. It's a one ton so I want a motor that can handle the load.


Marty
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2014 | 11:37 PM
  #5  
440roadrunner's Avatar
Mopar Lover
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,424
Likes: 248
There was a "heavy duty" motorhome "heavy truck" motor. If you are doing some TRULY heavy hauling you might want to look into it. I don't know how "late" they used this sort of thing Some of those engines used "Ford" 18mm plugs IE different heads, and may have used rotators on the valves, 'etc'
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2014 | 09:35 AM
  #6  
Skwerly's Avatar
Mopar Lover
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 118
The biggest differences you’ll see isn’t necessarily car to truck, it’s years. the ’68 318, for instance, was rated at a healthy 230hp and 340 foot pounds of torque. Once you get into the seventies, though, those numbers go waaaay down.

Also, keep in mind that before ’67, the 318 was a totally different beast (called the poly or wide 318), and parts don’t interchange to the LA version.

The biggest thing, by FAR, on a 318, as far as performance goes, are the heads. Do a little head work and you’ll have a thumper.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2014 | 10:28 AM
  #7  
440roadrunner's Avatar
Mopar Lover
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,424
Likes: 248
Please don't promote the "wide block" name 318, which is totally inappropriate. Yes, I realize, "everybody" calls them that, but they are NOT a "wide" block. If you strip down a poly block and sit them side by side with an LA, you might have a tough time telling them apart, unless you know just what to look for
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2014 | 02:15 PM
  #8  
Leem's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mopar Fanatic
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 447
Likes: 40
From: Quesnel, BC, Canada
Thank you for the further info. I have a line on a 318 from a Challenger. I don't need smoking horsepower. Just about anything is better than the 94 hp from the 230 flathead that's in it...lol. Just a question of making it fit.


Marty
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2014 | 08:35 AM
  #9  
Skwerly's Avatar
Mopar Lover
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 118
Originally Posted by 440roadrunner
Please don't promote the "wide block" name 318, which is totally inappropriate. Yes, I realize, "everybody" calls them that, but they are NOT a "wide" block. If you strip down a poly block and sit them side by side with an LA, you might have a tough time telling them apart, unless you know just what to look for

Oh yeah, I know, it annoys me, too, but I'm just covering bases in case someone called it that for him.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2014 | 09:33 AM
  #10  
moe7404's Avatar
Mopar Lover
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,846
Likes: 140
iam going to guess the 55 powerwagon has a 3.55 or 4.1 gear, so dont think you will get good MPG. OOPs the old man did it again. i looked up the specs. it has 4.89 or 5.83 gear. front and rear. load cap#3750 front........#6500 rear

Last edited by moe7404; Apr 5, 2014 at 09:46 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2014 | 11:01 AM
  #11  
RacerHog's Avatar
Mopar Lover
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 11,070
Likes: 952
From: Monrovia SO-CAL (USA)
Leem/Marty... You are so wrong !!!!!!!!!!
You need a rootin-tootin... MRL Performance Flame thrower in that truck... Like this one in the vid....


Last edited by RacerHog; Apr 6, 2014 at 07:36 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2014 | 11:24 PM
  #12  
Leem's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mopar Fanatic
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 447
Likes: 40
From: Quesnel, BC, Canada
Originally Posted by moe7404
iam going to guess the 55 powerwagon has a 3.55 or 4.1 gear, so dont think you will get good MPG. OOPs the old man did it again. i looked up the specs. it has 4.89 or 5.83 gear. front and rear. load cap#3750 front........#6500 rear


Yes, I am switching to the 4.89 gears, putting larger rims on and hooking up a cooler to the transfer case. Won't get blazing speed, but won't have to carry a lunch to go up hills...lol


Marty
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2014 | 11:25 PM
  #13  
Leem's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mopar Fanatic
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 447
Likes: 40
From: Quesnel, BC, Canada
hahaha...that is cool Bob.


Marty
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tomt
Mopar Classifieds
3
Feb 17, 2009 07:22 PM
carburetor
General Discussion
1
Apr 6, 2008 07:55 PM
Vaugh22
General Discussion
0
Feb 8, 2008 02:38 PM
66coronetgirlie
B-Body
2
Dec 18, 2007 07:06 PM
ProEmaster
General Technical Questions
2
Jun 6, 2007 11:31 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:33 PM.