What cam for my 440?
I've got a 1976 440 out of a motor home that I put in my '70 satellite. It has an Edelbrock RPM performer intake, Edelbrock 800 cfm carb, and headers, the rest is stock. I'm looking to put a different cam in it but not sure which one is best. I like a good lopey idle sound (nothing crazy though) but still need to maintain streetability. What cam will give me the best performance for this setup while still being streetable?
Welcome.
You probably have lower compression than 1967-1970, so knowing that will help your selection.
Can't go wrong with a smooth 1967 440HP cam or a step up to a 1969 1/2 440 six pack cam with high taper lifters.
You probably have lower compression than 1967-1970, so knowing that will help your selection.
Can't go wrong with a smooth 1967 440HP cam or a step up to a 1969 1/2 440 six pack cam with high taper lifters.
I have use the old Hemi cam in a low compression motor and it worked well, with 220 @ .050 lift its on the to "big side" for the low Compression 440.
https://www.summitracing.com/parts/cca-21-222-4
This has a little less duration which is a good thing but it's simular to the old hemi cam.
https://www.summitracing.com/parts/cca-21-222-4
This has a little less duration which is a good thing but it's simular to the old hemi cam.
70 -
I agreed with the above, but you also have to consider the stall on the converter (if an auto) and the gears in the rear.
With a stock converter and gears, a lopey idle will = a low vacuum and a sluggish roll.
Comp Cams has updated versions of the old Mopar sticks, and anything below the 509 model should work.
But again, the converter and gears may become a factor.
Archer
I agreed with the above, but you also have to consider the stall on the converter (if an auto) and the gears in the rear.
With a stock converter and gears, a lopey idle will = a low vacuum and a sluggish roll.
Comp Cams has updated versions of the old Mopar sticks, and anything below the 509 model should work.
But again, the converter and gears may become a factor.
Archer
I agree with all the above... There is not any gain in the H.P. area, But only a little to gain in the throttle response area, with a cam change. What your dealing with is an engine that might have like a 7.5 - 8.0 compression... So your kind of limited on how much more cam you can put in...
I myself like the VooDoo Cams....
I myself like the VooDoo Cams....
70 -
I agreed with the above, but you also have to consider the stall on the converter (if an auto) and the gears in the rear.
With a stock converter and gears, a lopey idle will = a low vacuum and a sluggish roll.
Comp Cams has updated versions of the old Mopar sticks, and anything below the 509 model should work.
But again, the converter and gears may become a factor.
Archer
I agreed with the above, but you also have to consider the stall on the converter (if an auto) and the gears in the rear.
With a stock converter and gears, a lopey idle will = a low vacuum and a sluggish roll.
Comp Cams has updated versions of the old Mopar sticks, and anything below the 509 model should work.
But again, the converter and gears may become a factor.
Archer
https://www.summitracing.com/parts/cca-21-221-4
will give your Mopar a nice boost in drivability, make sure that you install a new timing gear set also.
Me personally I would go with the first cam I put up but you have to be right on the money with your carb and ignition tuning.
70 -
"Stock" can mean as low as a 1200 rpm stall converter and 2.73 gears. Neither will like a performance cam. Sure, it'll run, but you won't like driving it.
Basically, you can enjoy it the way it is, or you can turn it into a long term project. The nice thing about the latter, is that once you have a plan, you can tackle it one part at a time, based on time and budget.
Archer
"Stock" can mean as low as a 1200 rpm stall converter and 2.73 gears. Neither will like a performance cam. Sure, it'll run, but you won't like driving it.
Basically, you can enjoy it the way it is, or you can turn it into a long term project. The nice thing about the latter, is that once you have a plan, you can tackle it one part at a time, based on time and budget.
Archer
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
robert_farmelo
General Discussion
6
Nov 24, 2009 03:16 PM




